Peter Alexander's AI Dogs: A Marketing Masterstroke or Misfire?
Share
Australian pyjama retailer Peter Alexander has ignited a debate with its latest marketing campaign, which heavily features generative AI-created dogs. While the brand aims to showcase a "peek into the Peter Alexander universe" with "AI magic," the campaign has faced significant backlash from consumers who question the use of AI over human graphic designers and find the results "creepy."
Key Takeaways
- Peter Alexander's AI dog campaign has drawn criticism for its "uncanny" appearance and potential impact on human designers.
- Experts suggest this type of AI marketing is the future, but brands must focus on emotional authenticity and human-centred content.
- Despite backlash, consumer psychologists doubt it will significantly harm the brand's bottom line due to habit and convenience.
Consumer Backlash and Expert Opinions
Social media platforms saw a flurry of negative comments regarding the AI-generated dogs, with some consumers even vowing to boycott the brand. Critics questioned the decision to employ artificial intelligence, with many finding the canine creations unsettling. However, consumer psychologist and creative strategist Adam Ferrier described the backlash as "ridiculous," likening the uproar to early criticisms of Photoshop in advertising. He believes that for a campaign to genuinely deter customers, it would need to be "incredibly bad, like almost inconceivably bad."
The Future of AI in Advertising
Experts like Dr. Christina Anthony, a lecturer and consumer psychologist at the University of Sydney Business School, believe that AI in marketing is "absolutely" the norm of the future. She stresses that the key challenge for brands will be "how well brands manage to make AI content feel emotionally authentic and human-centred." While some brands have used AI clumsily, leading to ridicule, Ferrier acknowledges that when used effectively, AI can be a powerful marketing tool. He points to campaigns his firm, Thinkerbell, has worked on using generative AI for clients like Victoria's Transport Accident Commission and Menulog.
Navigating the 'Uncanny Valley'
The "uncanny valley" effect, where AI-generated content appears almost human but slightly off, seems to be a significant factor in the negative reactions to Peter Alexander's campaign. Consumers expect warmth and a human touch from brands like Peter Alexander, and a "slick AI dog" may not meet those expectations. As AI technology advances and becomes more realistic, brands are likely to increasingly leverage it for cost efficiencies and increased output. However, the ethical implications, including the potential impact on human jobs, remain a consideration. Despite potential initial consumer resistance, experts predict that brands will continue to embrace AI due to its valuable efficiencies, and consumers will likely adapt over time, especially if the AI content is well-executed and human-centred.
Broader Industry Trends
Peter Alexander is not the first major brand to experiment with generative AI in its marketing efforts. In August, J. Crew and Vans launched a collaborative AI campaign, followed by brands like Guess, Valentino, and Moncler. These campaigns have also received mixed reactions, with some critics dismissing them as "AI slop" while others hail them as the future of advertising. The success and reception of these campaigns often hinge on the quality and perceived authenticity of the AI-generated content.